Finding Replicable Human Evaluations via Stable Ranking Probability
원문 초록
Reliable human evaluation is critical to the development of successful natural language generation models, but achieving it is notoriously difficult. Stability is a crucial requirement when ranking systems by quality: consistent ranking of systems across repeated evaluations is not just desirable, but essential. Without it, there is no reliable foundation for hill-climbing or product launch decisions. In this paper, we use machine translation and its state-of-the-art human evaluation framework, MQM, as a case study to understand how to set up reliable human evaluations that yield stable conclusions. We investigate the optimal configurations for item allocation to raters, number of ratings per item, and score normalization. Our study on two language pairs provides concrete recommendations for designing replicable human evaluation studies. We also collect and release the largest publicly available dataset of multi-segment translations rated by multiple professional translators, consisting of nearly 140,000 segment annotations across two language pairs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Document-Level Text Generation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Optimal Transport
Enhancing Paraphrase Type Generation: The Impact of DPO and RLHF Evaluated with Human-Ranked Data
Exploring the Relationship Between Diversity and Quality in Ad Text Generation
Large Language Models as Span Annotators
DeepSeek vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.