Large Language Models Are Struggle to Cope with Unreasonability in Math Problems
원문 초록
Recent research have demonstrated LLMs' impressive performance in math and reasoning. However, the capacity of LLMs to address math problems under unconventional conditions, such as internal inconsistencies and flawed assumptions, remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose a novel benchmark Unreasonable Math Problem (UMP) designed to assess LLMs' ability to recognize and respond to unreasonability in math problem. The benchmark consists of a carefully curated collection of unreasonable math questions across diverse types. Based on extensive experiments covering 19 LLMs, we observe that even state-of-the-art models such as GPT-4o achieve only limited performance of 0.6 in UMP, while reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1 are prone to overthinking and unstable. We further explore strategies for improving the recognition of unreasonable inputs, shedding light on both the possibility and limitations of LLMs in this challenging setting.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Personalized Exercise Recommendation with Semantically-Grounded Knowledge Tracing
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
A Practical Two-Stage Recipe for Mathematical LLMs: Maximizing Accuracy with SFT and Efficiency with Reinforcement Learning
The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gains
LLMThinkBench: Towards Basic Math Reasoning and Overthinking in Large Language Models
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.