Since the Scientific Literature Is Multilingual, Our Models Should Be Too
원문 초록
English has long been assumed the $\textit{lingua franca}$ of scientific research, and this notion is reflected in the natural language processing (NLP) research involving scientific document representation. In this position piece, we quantitatively show that the literature is largely multilingual and argue that current models and benchmarks should reflect this linguistic diversity. We provide evidence that text-based models fail to create meaningful representations for non-English papers and highlight the negative user-facing impacts of using English-only models non-discriminately across a multilingual domain. We end with suggestions for the NLP community on how to improve performance on non-English documents.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Cultural Evaluations of Vision-Language Models Have a Lot to Learn from Cultural Theory
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
Exploring Design of Multi-Agent LLM Dialogues for Research Ideation
MS-DPPs: Multi-Source Determinantal Point Processes for Contextual Diversity Refinement of Composite Attributes in Text to Image Retrieval
Prompt-Free Conditional Diffusion for Multi-object Image Augmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.