Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to outperform existing automatic evaluation metrics in some tasks, such as text summarization and machine translation. However, there has been a lack of research on LLMs as evaluators in grammatical error correction (GEC). In this study, we investigate the performance of LLMs in GEC evaluation by employing prompts designed to incorporate various evaluation criteria inspired by previous research. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate that GPT-4 achieved Kendall's rank correlation of 0.662 with human judgments, surpassing all existing methods. Furthermore, in recent GEC evaluations, we have underscored the significance of the LLMs scale and particularly emphasized the importance of fluency among evaluation criteria.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
DeepSeek vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?
Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
Predicting Compact Phrasal Rewrites with Large Language Models for ASR Post Editing
Twitter Sentiment Analysis
APE: Selective Fine-tuning with Acceptance Criteria for Language Model Adaptation
Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progress
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.