Multi-role Consensus through LLMs Discussions for Vulnerability Detection
원문 초록
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted the potential for vulnerability detection, a crucial component of software quality assurance. Despite this progress, most studies have been limited to the perspective of a single role, usually testers, lacking diverse viewpoints from different roles in a typical software development life-cycle, including both developers and testers. To this end, this paper introduces a multi-role approach to employ LLMs to act as different roles simulating a real-life code review process and engaging in discussions toward a consensus on the existence and classification of vulnerabilities in the code. Preliminary evaluation of this approach indicates a 13.48% increase in the precision rate, an 18.25% increase in the recall rate, and a 16.13% increase in the F1 score.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Boosting Vulnerability Detection of LLMs via Curriculum Preference Optimization with Synthetic Reasoning Data
SV-TrustEval-C: Evaluating Structure and Semantic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Source Code Vulnerability Analysis
CRAKEN: Cybersecurity LLM Agent with Knowledge-Based Execution
Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful for Java Function Bug Detection?
Can You Really Trust Code Copilots? Evaluating Large Language Models from a Code Security Perspective
Enhancing Large Language Models with Faster Code Preprocessing for Vulnerability Detection
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.