What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
원문 초록
This paper presents a way of enhancing the reliability of Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) in addressing hallucination, where the models generate cross-modal inconsistent responses. Without additional training, we propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into LMMs using self-generated counterfactual keywords. Our method is grounded in the concept of counterfactual thinking, a cognitive process where human considers alternative realities, enabling more extensive context exploration. Bridging the human cognition mechanism into LMMs, we aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding, mitigating hallucinatory outputs. We further introduce Plausibility Verification Process (PVP), a simple yet robust keyword constraint that effectively filters out sub-optimal keywords to enable the consistent triggering of counterfactual thinking in the model responses. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination and helps to broaden contextual understanding based on true visual clues.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
OWMM-Agent: Open World Mobile Manipulation With Multi-modal Agentic Data Synthesis
HalluSegBench: Counterfactual Visual Reasoning for Segmentation Hallucination Evaluation
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
Learning to Tune Like an Expert: Interpretable and Scene-Aware Navigation via MLLM Reasoning and CVAE-Based Adaptation
OST-Bench: Evaluating the Capabilities of MLLMs in Online Spatio-temporal Scene Understanding
UQLM: A Python Package for Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.