Mitigating Biases in Collective Decision-Making: Enhancing Performance in the Face of Fake News
원문 초록
Individual and social biases undermine the effectiveness of human advisers by inducing judgment errors which can disadvantage protected groups. In this paper, we study the influence these biases can have in the pervasive problem of fake news by evaluating human participants' capacity to identify false headlines. By focusing on headlines involving sensitive characteristics, we gather a comprehensive dataset to explore how human responses are shaped by their biases. Our analysis reveals recurring individual biases and their permeation into collective decisions. We show that demographic factors, headline categories, and the manner in which information is presented significantly influence errors in human judgment. We then use our collected data as a benchmark problem on which we evaluate the efficacy of adaptive aggregation algorithms. In addition to their improved accuracy, our results highlight the interactions between the emergence of collective intelligence and the mitigation of participant biases.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Graph-Structured Data Analysis of Component Failure in Autonomous Cargo Ships Based on Feature Fusion
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
InvestAlign: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Aligning Large Language Models with Investor Decision-Making Processes under Herd Behavior
VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systems
Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Causal Influence Prompting
NavMorph: A Self-Evolving World Model for Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environments
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.