Balancing Fairness and Accuracy in Data-Restricted Binary Classification
원문 초록
Applications that deal with sensitive information may have restrictions placed on the data available to a machine learning (ML) classifier. For example, in some applications, a classifier may not have direct access to sensitive attributes, affecting its ability to produce accurate and fair decisions. This paper proposes a framework that models the trade-off between accuracy and fairness under four practical scenarios that dictate the type of data available for analysis. Prior works examine this trade-off by analyzing the outputs of a scoring function that has been trained to implicitly learn the underlying distribution of the feature vector, class label, and sensitive attribute of a dataset. In contrast, our framework directly analyzes the behavior of the optimal Bayesian classifier on this underlying distribution by constructing a discrete approximation it from the dataset itself. This approach enables us to formulate multiple convex optimization problems, which allow us to answer the question: How is the accuracy of a Bayesian classifier affected in different data restricting scenarios when constrained to be fair? Analysis is performed on a set of fairness definitions that include group and individual fairness. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework as a tool for quantifying the trade-offs among different fairness notions and their distributional dependencies.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Robustly Improving LLM Fairness in Realistic Settings via Interpretability
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
IndianBailJudgments-1200: A Multi-Attribute Dataset for Legal NLP on Indian Bail Orders
FeDa4Fair: Client-Level Federated Datasets for Fairness Evaluation
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
Compositional Attribute Imbalance in Vision Datasets
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.