Comparing large language models and human programmers for generating programming code
원문 초록
We systematically evaluated the performance of seven large language models in generating programming code using various prompt strategies, programming languages, and task difficulties. GPT-4 substantially outperforms other large language models, including Gemini Ultra and Claude 2. The coding performance of GPT-4 varies considerably with different prompt strategies. In most LeetCode and GeeksforGeeks coding contests evaluated in this study, GPT-4 employing the optimal prompt strategy outperforms 85 percent of human participants. Additionally, GPT-4 demonstrates strong capabilities in translating code between different programming languages and in learning from past errors. The computational efficiency of the code generated by GPT-4 is comparable to that of human programmers. These results suggest that GPT-4 has the potential to serve as a reliable assistant in programming code generation and software development.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Technical Study into Small Reasoning Language Models
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
The Devil behind the mask: An emergent safety vulnerability of Diffusion LLMs
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
U-RWKV: Lightweight medical image segmentation with direction-adaptive RWKV
Kodezi Chronos: A Debugging-First Language Model for Repository-Scale, Memory-Driven Code Understanding
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.