Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness
원문 초록
In this paper, we present an empirical study on image recognition fairness, i.e., extreme class accuracy disparity on balanced data like ImageNet. We experimentally demonstrate that classes are not equal and the fairness issue is prevalent for image classification models across various datasets, network architectures, and model capacities. Moreover, several intriguing properties of fairness are identified. First, the unfairness lies in problematic representation rather than classifier bias. Second, with the proposed concept of Model Prediction Bias, we investigate the origins of problematic representation during optimization. Our findings reveal that models tend to exhibit greater prediction biases for classes that are more challenging to recognize. It means that more other classes will be confused with harder classes. Then the False Positives (FPs) will dominate the learning in optimization, thus leading to their poor accuracy. Further, we conclude that data augmentation and representation learning algorithms improve overall performance by promoting fairness to some degree in image classification. The Code is available at https://github.com/dvlab-research/Parametric-Contrastive-Learning.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
IPCL: Iterative Pseudo-Supervised Contrastive Learning to Improve Self-Supervised Feature Representation
Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation
DOMFN: A Divergence-Orientated Multi-Modal Fusion Network for Resume Assessment
Self-Supervised Learning for Multimedia Recommendation
Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management
When Graph Contrastive Learning Backfires: Spectral Vulnerability and Defense in Recommendation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.