Data Reconstruction Attacks and Defenses: A Systematic Evaluation
원문 초록
Reconstruction attacks and defenses are essential in understanding the data leakage problem in machine learning. However, prior work has centered around empirical observations of gradient inversion attacks, lacks theoretical grounding, and cannot disentangle the usefulness of defending methods from the computational limitation of attacking methods. In this work, we propose to view the problem as an inverse problem, enabling us to theoretically and systematically evaluate the data reconstruction attack. On various defense methods, we derived the algorithmic upper bound and the matching (in feature dimension and architecture dimension) information-theoretical lower bound on the reconstruction error for two-layer neural networks. To complement the theoretical results and investigate the utility-privacy trade-off, we defined a natural evaluation metric of the defense methods with similar utility loss among the strongest attacks. We further propose a strong reconstruction attack that helps update some previous understanding of the strength of defense methods under our proposed evaluation metric.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
TimberStrike: Dataset Reconstruction Attack Revealing Privacy Leakage in Federated Tree-Based Systems
DRAGD: A Federated Unlearning Data Reconstruction Attack Based on Gradient Differences
Byzantine Outside, Curious Inside: Reconstructing Data Through Malicious Updates
Cutting Through Privacy: A Hyperplane-Based Data Reconstruction Attack in Federated Learning
FLsim: A Modular and Library-Agnostic Simulation Framework for Federated Learning
Domain Borders Are There to Be Crossed With Federated Few-Shot Adaptation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.