Towards better Human-Agent Alignment: Assessing Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applications
원문 초록
The rapid development in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a surge in applications that facilitate collaboration among multiple agents to assist humans in their daily tasks. However, a significant gap remains in assessing whether LLM-powered applications genuinely enhance user experience and task execution efficiency. This highlights the pressing need for methods to verify utility of LLM-powered applications, particularly by ensuring alignment between the application's functionality and end-user needs. We introduce AgentEval provides an implementation for the math problems, a novel framework designed to simplify the utility verification process by automatically proposing a set of criteria tailored to the unique purpose of any given application. This allows for a comprehensive assessment, quantifying the utility of an application against the suggested criteria. We present a comprehensive analysis of the robustness of quantifier's work.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Personalized Exercise Recommendation with Semantically-Grounded Knowledge Tracing
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
A Practical Two-Stage Recipe for Mathematical LLMs: Maximizing Accuracy with SFT and Efficiency with Reinforcement Learning
The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gains
LLMThinkBench: Towards Basic Math Reasoning and Overthinking in Large Language Models
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.