Flexible infinite-width graph convolutional networks and the importance of representation learning
원문 초록
A common theoretical approach to understanding neural networks is to take an infinite-width limit, at which point the outputs become Gaussian process (GP) distributed. This is known as a neural network Gaussian process (NNGP). However, the NNGP kernel is fixed, and tunable only through a small number of hyperparameters, eliminating any possibility of representation learning. This contrasts with finite-width NNs, which are often believed to perform well precisely because they are able to learn representations. Thus in simplifying NNs to make them theoretically tractable, NNGPs may eliminate precisely what makes them work well (representation learning). This motivated us to understand whether representation learning is necessary in a range of graph classification tasks. We develop a precise tool for this task, the graph convolutional deep kernel machine. This is very similar to an NNGP, in that it is an infinite width limit and uses kernels, but comes with a `knob' to control the amount of representation learning. We found that representation learning is necessary (in the sense that it gives dramatic performance improvements) in graph classification tasks and heterophilous node classification tasks, but not in homophilous node classification tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Disentangled representations of microscopy images
Graph Semi-Supervised Learning for Point Classification on Data Manifolds
Wasserstein Hypergraph Neural Network
Devil's Hand: Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Private Graph Learning Protocols
Large-Scale Few-Shot Classification with Semi-supervised Hierarchical k-Probabilistic PCAs
Multi-hop Attention-based Graph Pooling: A Personalized PageRank Perspective
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.