Counterfactual Concept Bottleneck Models
원문 초록
Current deep learning models are not designed to simultaneously address three fundamental questions: predict class labels to solve a given classification task (the "What?"), simulate changes in the situation to evaluate how this impacts class predictions (the "How?"), and imagine how the scenario should change to result in different class predictions (the "Why not?"). The inability to answer these questions represents a crucial gap in deploying reliable AI agents, calibrating human trust, and improving human-machine interaction. To bridge this gap, we introduce CounterFactual Concept Bottleneck Models (CF-CBMs), a class of models designed to efficiently address the above queries all at once without the need to run post-hoc searches. Our experimental results demonstrate that CF-CBMs: achieve classification accuracy comparable to black-box models and existing CBMs ("What?"), rely on fewer important concepts leading to simpler explanations ("How?"), and produce interpretable, concept-based counterfactuals ("Why not?"). Additionally, we show that training the counterfactual generator jointly with the CBM leads to two key improvements: (i) it alters the model's decision-making process, making the model rely on fewer important concepts (leading to simpler explanations), and (ii) it significantly increases the causal effect of concept interventions on class predictions, making the model more responsive to these changes.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Turning Sand to Gold: Recycling Data to Bridge On-Policy and Off-Policy Learning via Causal Bound
Social Group Bias in AI Finance
CF-Seg: Counterfactuals meet Segmentation
The Role of Explanation Styles and Perceived Accuracy on Decision Making in Predictive Process Monitoring
Going from a Representative Agent to Counterfactuals in Combinatorial Choice
DiCoFlex: Model-agnostic diverse counterfactuals with flexible control
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.