Do We Need Language-Specific Fact-Checking Models? The Case of Chinese
원문 초록
This paper investigates the potential benefits of language-specific fact-checking models, focusing on the case of Chinese. We first demonstrate the limitations of translation-based methods and multilingual large language models (e.g., GPT-4), highlighting the need for language-specific systems. We further propose a Chinese fact-checking system that can better retrieve evidence from a document by incorporating context information. To better analyze token-level biases in different systems, we construct an adversarial dataset based on the CHEF dataset, where each instance has large word overlap with the original one but holds the opposite veracity label. Experimental results on the CHEF dataset and our adversarial dataset show that our proposed method outperforms translation-based methods and multilingual LLMs and is more robust toward biases, while there is still large room for improvement, emphasizing the importance of language-specific fact-checking systems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing
A Personalized Conversational Benchmark: Towards Simulating Personalized Conversations
Chronocept: Instilling a Sense of Time in Machines
Veracity: An Open-Source AI Fact-Checking System
In Crowd Veritas: Leveraging Human Intelligence To Fight Misinformation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.