Do We Really Even Need Data?
원문 초록
As artificial intelligence and machine learning tools become more accessible, and scientists face new obstacles to data collection (e.g. rising costs, declining survey response rates), researchers increasingly use predictions from pre-trained algorithms as outcome variables. Though appealing for financial and logistical reasons, using standard tools for inference can misrepresent the association between independent variables and the outcome of interest when the true, unobserved outcome is replaced by a predicted value. In this paper, we characterize the statistical challenges inherent to this so-called ``inference with predicted data'' problem and elucidate three potential sources of error: (i) the relationship between predicted outcomes and their true, unobserved counterparts, (ii) robustness of the machine learning model to resampling or uncertainty about the training data, and (iii) appropriately propagating not just bias but also uncertainty from predictions into the ultimate inference procedure.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Network driven sampling; a critical threshold for design effects
Prediction-powered estimators for finite population statistics in highly imbalanced textual data: Public hate crime estimation
A step towards the integration of machine learning and small area estimation
Mixed Matrix Completion in Complex Survey Sampling under Heterogeneous Missingness
Asymptotically Unbiased Off-Policy Policy Evaluation when Reusing Old Data in Nonstationary Environments
Sampling Algorithms, from Survey Sampling to Monte Carlo Methods: Tutorial and Literature Review
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.