A Study on Large Language Models' Limitations in Multiple-Choice Question Answering
원문 초록
The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become commonplace, particularly with the emergence of open-source models. More importantly, smaller models are well-suited for integration into consumer devices and are frequently employed either as standalone solutions or as subroutines in various AI tasks. Despite their ubiquitous use, there is no systematic analysis of their specific capabilities and limitations. In this study, we tackle one of the most widely used tasks - answering Multiple Choice Question (MCQ). We analyze 26 small open-source models and find that 65% of the models do not understand the task, only 4 models properly select an answer from the given choices, and only 5 of these models are choice order independent. These results are rather alarming given the extensive use of MCQ tests with these models. We recommend exercising caution and testing task understanding before using MCQ to evaluate LLMs in any field whatsoever.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Training-free LLM Merging for Multi-task Learning
VAU-R1: Advancing Video Anomaly Understanding via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
How Far Can Off-the-Shelf Multimodal Large Language Models Go in Online Episodic Memory Question Answering?
WikiMixQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Question Answering over Tables and Charts
Instruction Tuning and CoT Prompting for Contextual Medical QA with LLMs
Different Questions, Different Models: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Uncertainty and Calibration in Clinical QA with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.