PythonSaga: Redefining the Benchmark to Evaluate Code Generating LLMs
원문 초록
Driven by the surge in code generation using large language models (LLMs), numerous benchmarks have emerged to evaluate these LLMs capabilities. We conducted a large-scale human evaluation of HumanEval and MBPP, two popular benchmarks for Python code generation, analyzing their diversity and difficulty. Our findings unveil a critical bias towards a limited set of programming concepts, neglecting most of the other concepts entirely. Furthermore, we uncover a worrying prevalence of easy tasks, potentially inflating model performance estimations. To address these limitations, we propose a novel benchmark, PythonSaga, featuring 185 hand-crafted prompts on a balanced representation of 38 programming concepts across diverse difficulty levels. The robustness of our benchmark is demonstrated by the poor performance of existing Code-LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Turning the Tide: Repository-based Code Reflection
SACL: Understanding and Combating Textual Bias in Code Retrieval with Semantic-Augmented Reranking and Localization
Enhancing LLM-Based Code Generation with Complexity Metrics: A Feedback-Driven Approach
Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing
any4: Learned 4-bit Numeric Representation for LLMs
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.