Assessing the Impact of Prompting Methods on ChatGPT's Mathematical Capabilities
원문 초록
This study critically evaluates the efficacy of prompting methods in enhancing the mathematical reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs). The investigation uses three prescriptive prompting methods - simple, persona, and conversational prompting - known for their effectiveness in enhancing the linguistic tasks of LLMs. We conduct this analysis on OpenAI's LLM chatbot, ChatGPT-3.5, on extensive problem sets from the MATH, GSM8K, and MMLU datasets, encompassing a broad spectrum of mathematical challenges. A grading script adapted to each dataset is used to determine the effectiveness of these prompting interventions in enhancing the model's mathematical analysis power. Contrary to expectations, our empirical analysis reveals that none of the investigated methods consistently improves over ChatGPT-3.5's baseline performance, with some causing significant degradation. Our findings suggest that prompting strategies do not necessarily generalize to new domains, in this study failing to enhance mathematical performance.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Slimming Down LLMs Without Losing Their Minds
The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gains
any4: Learned 4-bit Numeric Representation for LLMs
AALC: Large Language Model Efficient Reasoning via Adaptive Accuracy-Length Control
OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scaling
AgentGroupChat-V2: Divide-and-Conquer Is What LLM-Based Multi-Agent System Need
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.