Hidden yet quantifiable: A lower bound for confounding strength using randomized trials
원문 초록
In the era of fast-paced precision medicine, observational studies play a major role in properly evaluating new treatments in clinical practice. Yet, unobserved confounding can significantly compromise causal conclusions drawn from non-randomized data. We propose a novel strategy that leverages randomized trials to quantify unobserved confounding. First, we design a statistical test to detect unobserved confounding with strength above a given threshold. Then, we use the test to estimate an asymptotically valid lower bound on the unobserved confounding strength. We evaluate the power and validity of our statistical test on several synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets. Further, we show how our lower bound can correctly identify the absence and presence of unobserved confounding in a real-world setting.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The kernel of graph indices for vector search
Model-Based Real-Time Pose and Sag Estimation of Overhead Power Lines Using LiDAR for Drone Inspection
PocketVina Enables Scalable and Highly Accurate Physically Valid Docking through Multi-Pocket Conditioning
SWE-Factory: Your Automated Factory for Issue Resolution Training Data and Evaluation Benchmarks
Step-by-step Instructions and a Simple Tabular Output Format Improve the Dependency Parsing Accuracy of LLMs
Employing self-supervised learning models for cross-linguistic child speech maturity classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.