ClimateX: Do LLMs Accurately Assess Human Expert Confidence in Climate Statements?
원문 초록
Evaluating the accuracy of outputs generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) is especially important in the climate science and policy domain. We introduce the Expert Confidence in Climate Statements (ClimateX) dataset, a novel, curated, expert-labeled dataset consisting of 8094 climate statements collected from the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, labeled with their associated confidence levels. Using this dataset, we show that recent LLMs can classify human expert confidence in climate-related statements, especially in a few-shot learning setting, but with limited (up to 47%) accuracy. Overall, models exhibit consistent and significant over-confidence on low and medium confidence statements. We highlight implications of our results for climate communication, LLMs evaluation strategies, and the use of LLMs in information retrieval systems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
JointRank: Rank Large Set with Single Pass
From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
Universal Music Representations? Evaluating Foundation Models on World Music Corpora
DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
Exp4Fuse: A Rank Fusion Framework for Enhanced Sparse Retrieval using Large Language Model-based Query Expansion
From Chaos to Automation: Enabling the Use of Unstructured Data for Robotic Process Automation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.