Do Localization Methods Actually Localize Memorized Data in LLMs? A Tale of Two Benchmarks
원문 초록
The concept of localization in LLMs is often mentioned in prior work; however, methods for localization have never been systematically and directly evaluated. We propose two complementary benchmarks that evaluate the ability of localization methods to pinpoint LLM components responsible for memorized data. In our INJ benchmark, we actively inject a piece of new information into a small subset of LLM weights, enabling us to directly evaluate whether localization methods can identify these "ground truth" weights. In our DEL benchmark, we evaluate localization by measuring how much dropping out identified neurons deletes a memorized pretrained sequence. Despite their different perspectives, our two benchmarks yield consistent rankings of five localization methods. Methods adapted from network pruning perform well on both benchmarks, and all evaluated methods show promising localization ability. On the other hand, even successful methods identify neurons that are not specific to a single memorized sequence.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
B-XAIC Dataset: Benchmarking Explainable AI for Graph Neural Networks Using Chemical Data
SenseShift6D: Multimodal RGB-D Benchmarking for Robust 6D Pose Estimation across Environment and Sensor Variations
DVFL-Net: A Lightweight Distilled Video Focal Modulation Network for Spatio-Temporal Action Recognition
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
FLsim: A Modular and Library-Agnostic Simulation Framework for Federated Learning
DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.