The ART of LLM Refinement: Ask, Refine, and Trust
원문 초록
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generative abilities, but can they judge the quality of their own generations? A popular concept, referred to as self-refinement, postulates that LLMs can detect and correct the errors in their generations when asked to do so. However, recent empirical evidence points in the opposite direction, suggesting that LLMs often struggle to accurately identify errors when reasoning is involved. To address this, we propose a reasoning with refinement objective called ART: Ask, Refine, and Trust, which asks necessary questions to decide when an LLM should refine its output, and either affirm or withhold trust in its refinement by ranking the refinement and the initial prediction. On two multistep reasoning tasks of mathematical word problems (GSM8K) and question answering (StrategyQA), ART achieves a performance gain of +5 points over self-refinement baselines, while using a much smaller model as the decision maker. We also demonstrate the benefit of using smaller models to make refinement decisions as a cost-effective alternative to fine-tuning a larger model.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Re-Initialization Token Learning for Tool-Augmented Large Language Models
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
DAC: A Dynamic Attention-aware Approach for Task-Agnostic Prompt Compression
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
Warehouse Spatial Question Answering with LLM Agent
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.