Validating ChatGPT Facts through RDF Knowledge Graphs and Sentence Similarity
원문 초록
Since ChatGPT offers detailed responses without justifications, and erroneous facts even for popular persons, events and places, in this paper we present a novel pipeline that retrieves the response of ChatGPT in RDF and tries to validate the ChatGPT facts using one or more RDF Knowledge Graphs (KGs). To this end we leverage DBpedia and LODsyndesis (an aggregated Knowledge Graph that contains 2 billion triples from 400 RDF KGs of many domains) and short sentence embeddings, and introduce an algorithm that returns the more relevant triple(s) accompanied by their provenance and a confidence score. This enables the validation of ChatGPT responses and their enrichment with justifications and provenance. To evaluate this service (such services in general), we create an evaluation benchmark that includes 2,000 ChatGPT facts; specifically 1,000 facts for famous Greek Persons, 500 facts for popular Greek Places, and 500 facts for Events related to Greece. The facts were manually labelled (approximately 73% of ChatGPT facts were correct and 27% of facts were erroneous). The results are promising; indicatively for the whole benchmark, we managed to verify the 85.3% of the correct facts of ChatGPT and to find the correct answer for the 58% of the erroneous ChatGPT facts.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLMs Are Not Scorers: Rethinking MT Evaluation with Generation-Based Methods
Contrastive Prompting Enhances Sentence Embeddings in LLMs through Inference-Time Steering
Sentence Embeddings as an intermediate target in end-to-end summarisation
JTCSE: Joint Tensor-Modulus Constraints and Cross-Attention for Unsupervised Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
From Neurons to Semantics: Evaluating Cross-Linguistic Alignment Capabilities of Large Language Models via Neurons Alignment
SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.