LLMs grasp morality in concept
원문 초록
Work in AI ethics and fairness has made much progress in regulating LLMs to reflect certain values, such as fairness, truth, and diversity. However, it has taken the problem of how LLMs might 'mean' anything at all for granted. Without addressing this, it is not clear what imbuing LLMs with such values even means. In response, we provide a general theory of meaning that extends beyond humans. We use this theory to explicate the precise nature of LLMs as meaning-agents. We suggest that the LLM, by virtue of its position as a meaning-agent, already grasps the constructions of human society (e.g. morality, gender, and race) in concept. Consequently, under certain ethical frameworks, currently popular methods for model alignment are limited at best and counterproductive at worst. Moreover, unaligned models may help us better develop our moral and social philosophy.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LumiCRS: Asymmetric Contrastive Prototype Learning for Long-Tail Conversational Movie Recommendation
What Is the Point of Equality in Machine Learning Fairness? Beyond Equality of Opportunity
GRAIL: A Benchmark for GRaph ActIve Learning in Dynamic Sensing Environments
FG 2025 TrustFAA: the First Workshop on Towards Trustworthy Facial Affect Analysis: Advancing Insights of Fairness, Explainability, and Safety (TrustFAA)
Subtractive Aggregation for Attributed Network Anomaly Detection
A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.