Robustness Tests for Automatic Machine Translation Metrics with Adversarial Attacks
원문 초록
We investigate MT evaluation metric performance on adversarially-synthesized texts, to shed light on metric robustness. We experiment with word- and character-level attacks on three popular machine translation metrics: BERTScore, BLEURT, and COMET. Our human experiments validate that automatic metrics tend to overpenalize adversarially-degraded translations. We also identify inconsistencies in BERTScore ratings, where it judges the original sentence and the adversarially-degraded one as similar, while judging the degraded translation as notably worse than the original with respect to the reference. We identify patterns of brittleness that motivate more robust metric development.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation
ConECT Dataset: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Context-Aware E-Commerce MT
Building a Functional Machine Translation Corpus for Kpelle
Combining the Best of Both Worlds: A Method for Hybrid NMT and LLM Translation
Same evaluation, more tokens: On the effect of input length for machine translation evaluation using Large Language Models
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.