The Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task on Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metrics
원문 초록
With an increasing number of parameters and pre-training data, generative large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities to solve tasks with minimal or no task-related examples. Notably, LLMs have been successfully employed as evaluation metrics in text generation tasks. Within this context, we introduce the Eval4NLP 2023 shared task that asks participants to explore prompting and score extraction for machine translation (MT) and summarization evaluation. Specifically, we propose a novel competition setting in which we select a list of allowed LLMs and disallow fine-tuning to ensure a focus on prompting. We present an overview of participants' approaches and evaluate them on a new reference-free test set spanning three language pairs for MT and a summarization dataset. Notably, despite the task's restrictions, the best-performing systems achieve results on par with or even surpassing recent reference-free metrics developed using larger models, including GEMBA and Comet-Kiwi-XXL. Finally, as a separate track, we perform a small-scale human evaluation of the plausibility of explanations given by the LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Document-Level Text Generation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Optimal Transport
Enhancing Paraphrase Type Generation: The Impact of DPO and RLHF Evaluated with Human-Ranked Data
Exploring the Relationship Between Diversity and Quality in Ad Text Generation
Large Language Models as Span Annotators
DeepSeek vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.