Guiding LLM to Fool Itself: Automatically Manipulating Machine Reading Comprehension Shortcut Triggers
원문 초록
Recent applications of LLMs in Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) systems have shown impressive results, but the use of shortcuts, mechanisms triggered by features spuriously correlated to the true label, has emerged as a potential threat to their reliability. We analyze the problem from two angles: LLMs as editors, guided to edit text to mislead LLMs; and LLMs as readers, who answer questions based on the edited text. We introduce a framework that guides an editor to add potential shortcuts-triggers to samples. Using GPT4 as the editor, we find it can successfully edit trigger shortcut in samples that fool LLMs. Analysing LLMs as readers, we observe that even capable LLMs can be deceived using shortcut knowledge. Strikingly, we discover that GPT4 can be deceived by its own edits (15% drop in F1). Our findings highlight inherent vulnerabilities of LLMs to shortcut manipulations. We publish ShortcutQA, a curated dataset generated by our framework for future research.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MRCEval: A Comprehensive, Challenging and Accessible Machine Reading Comprehension Benchmark
RoleMRC: A Fine-Grained Composite Benchmark for Role-Playing and Instruction-Following
RoBIn: A Transformer-Based Model For Risk Of Bias Inference With Machine Reading Comprehension
Developing PUGG for Polish: A Modern Approach to KBQA, MRC, and IR Dataset Construction
Multi-Grained Query-Guided Set Prediction Network for Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition
From Multiple-Choice to Extractive QA: A Case Study for English and Arabic
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.