Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimization
원문 초록
Like many optimizers, Bayesian optimization often falls short of gaining user trust due to opacity. While attempts have been made to develop human-centric optimizers, they typically assume user knowledge is well-specified and error-free, employing users mainly as supervisors of the optimization process. We relax these assumptions and propose a more balanced human-AI partnership with our Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimization (CoExBO) framework. Instead of explicitly requiring a user to provide a knowledge model, CoExBO employs preference learning to seamlessly integrate human insights into the optimization, resulting in algorithmic suggestions that resonate with user preference. CoExBO explains its candidate selection every iteration to foster trust, empowering users with a clearer grasp of the optimization. Furthermore, CoExBO offers a no-harm guarantee, allowing users to make mistakes; even with extreme adversarial interventions, the algorithm converges asymptotically to a vanilla Bayesian optimization. We validate CoExBO's efficacy through human-AI teaming experiments in lithium-ion battery design, highlighting substantial improvements over conventional methods. Code is available https://github.com/ma921/CoExBO.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization
Reinforcement Learning Increases Wind Farm Power Production by Enabling Closed-Loop Collaborative Control
Fast Bayesian Optimization of Function Networks with Partial Evaluations
Amortized variational transdimensional inference
VirnyFlow: A Design Space for Responsible Model Development
Bridging Quantum and Classical Computing in Drug Design: Architecture Principles for Improved Molecule Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.