XTSC-Bench: Quantitative Benchmarking for Explainers on Time Series Classification
원문 초록
Despite the growing body of work on explainable machine learning in time series classification (TSC), it remains unclear how to evaluate different explainability methods. Resorting to qualitative assessment and user studies to evaluate explainers for TSC is difficult since humans have difficulties understanding the underlying information contained in time series data. Therefore, a systematic review and quantitative comparison of explanation methods to confirm their correctness becomes crucial. While steps to standardized evaluations were taken for tabular, image, and textual data, benchmarking explainability methods on time series is challenging due to a) traditional metrics not being directly applicable, b) implementation and adaption of traditional metrics for time series in the literature vary, and c) varying baseline implementations. This paper proposes XTSC-Bench, a benchmarking tool providing standardized datasets, models, and metrics for evaluating explanation methods on TSC. We analyze 3 perturbation-, 6 gradient- and 2 example-based explanation methods to TSC showing that improvements in the explainers' robustness and reliability are necessary, especially for multivariate data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Benchmarking Unsupervised Strategies for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods
TimeMaster: Training Time-Series Multimodal LLMs to Reason via Reinforcement Learning
The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning
STACT-Time: Spatio-Temporal Cross Attention for Cine Thyroid Ultrasound Time Series Classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.