Mitigating Bias for Question Answering Models by Tracking Bias Influence
원문 초록
Models of various NLP tasks have been shown to exhibit stereotypes, and the bias in the question answering (QA) models is especially harmful as the output answers might be directly consumed by the end users. There have been datasets to evaluate bias in QA models, while bias mitigation technique for the QA models is still under-explored. In this work, we propose BMBI, an approach to mitigate the bias of multiple-choice QA models. Based on the intuition that a model would lean to be more biased if it learns from a biased example, we measure the bias level of a query instance by observing its influence on another instance. If the influenced instance is more biased, we derive that the query instance is biased. We then use the bias level detected as an optimization objective to form a multi-task learning setting in addition to the original QA task. We further introduce a new bias evaluation metric to quantify bias in a comprehensive and sensitive way. We show that our method could be applied to multiple QA formulations across multiple bias categories. It can significantly reduce the bias level in all 9 bias categories in the BBQ dataset while maintaining comparable QA accuracy.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Training-free LLM Merging for Multi-task Learning
VAU-R1: Advancing Video Anomaly Understanding via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
How Far Can Off-the-Shelf Multimodal Large Language Models Go in Online Episodic Memory Question Answering?
WikiMixQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Question Answering over Tables and Charts
Instruction Tuning and CoT Prompting for Contextual Medical QA with LLMs
Different Questions, Different Models: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Uncertainty and Calibration in Clinical QA with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.