Calibrating Likelihoods towards Consistency in Summarization Models
원문 초록
Despite the recent advances in abstractive text summarization, current summarization models still suffer from generating factually inconsistent summaries, reducing their utility for real-world application. We argue that the main reason for such behavior is that the summarization models trained with maximum likelihood objective assign high probability to plausible sequences given the context, but they often do not accurately rank sequences by their consistency. In this work, we solve this problem by calibrating the likelihood of model generated sequences to better align with a consistency metric measured by natural language inference (NLI) models. The human evaluation study and automatic metrics show that the calibrated models generate more consistent and higher-quality summaries. We also show that the models trained using our method return probabilities that are better aligned with the NLI scores, which significantly increase reliability of summarization models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Split-then-Join Approach to Abstractive Summarization for Very Long Documents in a Low Resource Setting
Self-Rationalization in the Wild: A Large Scale Out-of-Distribution Evaluation on NLI-related tasks
Survey on Abstractive Text Summarization: Dataset, Models, and Metrics
DomainSum: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Fine-Grained Domain Shift in Abstractive Text Summarization
L3Cube-MahaSum: A Comprehensive Dataset and BART Models for Abstractive Text Summarization in Marathi
Take It Easy: Label-Adaptive Self-Rationalization for Fact Verification and Explanation Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.