Measuring Information in Text Explanations
원문 초록
Text-based explanation is a particularly promising approach in explainable AI, but the evaluation of text explanations is method-dependent. We argue that placing the explanations on an information-theoretic framework could unify the evaluations of two popular text explanation methods: rationale and natural language explanations (NLE). This framework considers the post-hoc text pipeline as a series of communication channels, which we refer to as ``explanation channels''. We quantify the information flow through these channels, thereby facilitating the assessment of explanation characteristics. We set up tools for quantifying two information scores: relevance and informativeness. We illustrate what our proposed information scores measure by comparing them against some traditional evaluation metrics. Our information-theoretic scores reveal some unique observations about the underlying mechanisms of two representative text explanations. For example, the NLEs trade-off slightly between transmitting the input-related information and the target-related information, whereas the rationales do not exhibit such a trade-off mechanism. Our work contributes to the ongoing efforts in establishing rigorous and standardized evaluation criteria in the rapidly evolving field of explainable AI.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Multi-Preference Lambda-weighted Listwise DPO for Dynamic Preference Alignment
CuRe: Cultural Gaps in the Long Tail of Text-to-Image Systems
ERU-KG: Efficient Reference-aligned Unsupervised Keyphrase Generation
Power-Law Decay Loss for Large Language Model Finetuning: Focusing on Information Sparsity to Enhance Generation Quality
ICYM2I: The illusion of multimodal informativeness under missingness
Laplace Sample Information: Data Informativeness Through a Bayesian Lens
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.