Refutation of Shapley Values for XAI -- Additional Evidence
원문 초록
Recent work demonstrated the inadequacy of Shapley values for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Although to disprove a theory a single counterexample suffices, a possible criticism of earlier work is that the focus was solely on Boolean classifiers. To address such possible criticism, this paper demonstrates the inadequacy of Shapley values for families of classifiers where features are not boolean, but also for families of classifiers for which multiple classes can be picked. Furthermore, the paper shows that the features changed in any minimal $l_0$ distance adversarial examples do not include irrelevant features, thus offering further arguments regarding the inadequacy of Shapley values for XAI.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Communicating Smartly in the Molecular Domain: Neural Networks in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
Do Protein Transformers Have Biological Intelligence?
TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation
Addressing the Scarcity of Benchmarks for Graph XAI
Heart2Mind: Human-Centered Contestable Psychiatric Disorder Diagnosis System using Wearable ECG Monitors
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.