Automatic Answerability Evaluation for Question Generation
원문 초록
Conventional automatic evaluation metrics, such as BLEU and ROUGE, developed for natural language generation (NLG) tasks, are based on measuring the n-gram overlap between the generated and reference text. These simple metrics may be insufficient for more complex tasks, such as question generation (QG), which requires generating questions that are answerable by the reference answers. Developing a more sophisticated automatic evaluation metric, thus, remains an urgent problem in QG research. This work proposes PMAN (Prompting-based Metric on ANswerability), a novel automatic evaluation metric to assess whether the generated questions are answerable by the reference answers for the QG tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that its evaluation results are reliable and align with human evaluations. We further apply our metric to evaluate the performance of QG models, which shows that our metric complements conventional metrics. Our implementation of a GPT-based QG model achieves state-of-the-art performance in generating answerable questions.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Compressed and Smooth Latent Space for Text Diffusion Modeling
Bench4KE: Benchmarking Automated Competency Question Generation
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
Multi-Hop Question Generation via Dual-Perspective Keyword Guidance
KG-QAGen: A Knowledge-Graph-Based Framework for Systematic Question Generation and Long-Context LLM Evaluation
Enhancing the Learning Experience: Using Vision-Language Models to Generate Questions for Educational Videos
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.