SQUARE: Automatic Question Answering Evaluation using Multiple Positive and Negative References
원문 초록
Evaluation of QA systems is very challenging and expensive, with the most reliable approach being human annotations of correctness of answers for questions. Recent works (AVA, BEM) have shown that transformer LM encoder based similarity metrics transfer well for QA evaluation, but they are limited by the usage of a single correct reference answer. We propose a new evaluation metric: SQuArE (Sentence-level QUestion AnsweRing Evaluation), using multiple reference answers (combining multiple correct and incorrect references) for sentence-form QA. We evaluate SQuArE on both sentence-level extractive (Answer Selection) and generative (GenQA) QA systems, across multiple academic and industrial datasets, and show that it outperforms previous baselines and obtains the highest correlation with human annotations.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Semantic similarity estimation for domain specific data using BERT and other techniques
Neural at ArchEHR-QA 2025: Agentic Prompt Optimization for Evidence-Grounded Clinical Question Answering
MedPAIR: Measuring Physicians and AI Relevance Alignment in Medical Question Answering
StressTest: Can YOUR Speech LM Handle the Stress?
NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation?
Interpretable Natural Language Segmentation Based on Link Grammar
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.