Comparative study of Deep Learning Models for Binary Classification on Combined Pulmonary Chest X-ray Dataset
원문 초록
CNN-based deep learning models for disease detection have become popular recently. We compared the binary classification performance of eight prominent deep learning models: DenseNet 121, DenseNet 169, DenseNet 201, EffecientNet b0, EffecientNet lite4, GoogleNet, MobileNet, and ResNet18 for their binary classification performance on combined Pulmonary Chest Xrays dataset. Despite the widespread application in different fields in medical images, there remains a knowledge gap in determining their relative performance when applied to the same dataset, a gap this study aimed to address. The dataset combined Shenzhen, China (CH) and Montgomery, USA (MC) data. We trained our model for binary classification, calculated different parameters of the mentioned models, and compared them. The models were trained to keep in mind all following the same training parameters to maintain a controlled comparison environment. End of the study, we found a distinct difference in performance among the other models when applied to the pulmonary chest Xray image dataset, where DenseNet169 performed with 89.38 percent and MobileNet with 92.2 percent precision. Keywords: Pulmonary, Deep Learning, Tuberculosis, Disease detection, Xray
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
PatchDEMUX: A Certifiably Robust Framework for Multi-label Classifiers Against Adversarial Patches
Zero-Shot Multi-modal Large Language Model v.s. Supervised Deep Learning: A Comparative Study on CT-Based Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtyping
Detecting immune cells with label-free two-photon autofluorescence and deep learning
Adversarial Surrogate Risk Bounds for Binary Classification
Hidden Persuasion: Detecting Manipulative Narratives on Social Media During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine
Leveraging Cascaded Binary Classification and Multimodal Fusion for Dementia Detection through Spontaneous Speech
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.