Resolving Legalese: A Multilingual Exploration of Negation Scope Resolution in Legal Documents
원문 초록
Resolving the scope of a negation within a sentence is a challenging NLP task. The complexity of legal texts and the lack of annotated in-domain negation corpora pose challenges for state-of-the-art (SotA) models when performing negation scope resolution on multilingual legal data. Our experiments demonstrate that models pre-trained without legal data underperform in the task of negation scope resolution. Our experiments, using language models exclusively fine-tuned on domains like literary texts and medical data, yield inferior results compared to the outcomes documented in prior cross-domain experiments. We release a new set of annotated court decisions in German, French, and Italian and use it to improve negation scope resolution in both zero-shot and multilingual settings. We achieve token-level F1-scores of up to 86.7% in our zero-shot cross-lingual experiments, where the models are trained on two languages of our legal datasets and evaluated on the third. Our multilingual experiments, where the models were trained on all available negation data and evaluated on our legal datasets, resulted in F1-scores of up to 91.1%.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding
NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation?
Disentangling Linguistic Features with Dimension-Wise Analysis of Vector Embeddings
Negation: A Pink Elephant in the Large Language Models' Room?
Sentinel: Decoding Context Utilization via Attention Probing for Efficient LLM Context Compression
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.