On the Injunction of XAIxArt
원문 초록
The position paper highlights the range of concerns that are engulfed in the injunction of explainable artificial intelligence in art (XAIxArt). Through a series of quick sub-questions, it points towards the ambiguities concerning 'explanation' and the postpositivist tradition of 'relevant explanation'. Rejecting both 'explanation' and 'relevant explanation', the paper takes a stance that XAIxArt is a symptom of insecurity of the anthropocentric notion of art and a nostalgic desire to return to outmoded notions of authorship and human agency. To justify this stance, the paper makes a distinction between an ornamentation model of explanation to a model of explanation as sense-making.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
Communicating Smartly in the Molecular Domain: Neural Networks in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
JoFormer (Journey-based Transformer): Theory and Empirical Analysis on the Tiny Shakespeare Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.