Tight Bounds for Machine Unlearning via Differential Privacy
원문 초록
We consider the formulation of "machine unlearning" of Sekhari, Acharya, Kamath, and Suresh (NeurIPS 2021), which formalizes the so-called "right to be forgotten" by requiring that a trained model, upon request, should be able to "unlearn" a number of points from the training data, as if they had never been included in the first place. Sekhari et al. established some positive and negative results about the number of data points that can be successfully unlearnt by a trained model without impacting the model's accuracy (the "deletion capacity"), showing that machine unlearning could be achieved by using differentially private (DP) algorithms. However, their results left open a gap between upper and lower bounds on the deletion capacity of these algorithms: our work fully closes this gap, obtaining tight bounds on the deletion capacity achievable by DP-based machine unlearning algorithms.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Model State Arithmetic for Machine Unlearning
Rectifying Privacy and Efficacy Measurements in Machine Unlearning: A New Inference Attack Perspective
Membership Inference Attacks as Privacy Tools: Reliability, Disparity and Ensemble
Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model Outputs
Apollo: A Posteriori Label-Only Membership Inference Attack Towards Machine Unlearning
Certified Unlearning for Neural Networks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.