Response: Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models
원문 초록
In their recent Nature Human Behaviour paper, "Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models," (Webb, Holyoak, and Lu, 2023) the authors argue that "large language models such as GPT-3 have acquired an emergent ability to find zero-shot solutions to a broad range of analogy problems." In this response, we provide counterexamples of the letter string analogies. In our tests, GPT-3 fails to solve simplest variations of the original tasks, whereas human performance remains consistently high across all modified versions. Zero-shot reasoning is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. We do not see that evidence in our experiments. To strengthen claims of humanlike reasoning such as zero-shot reasoning, it is important that the field develop approaches that rule out data memorization.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
Dataset distillation for memorized data: Soft labels can leak held-out teacher knowledge
LexiMark: Robust Watermarking via Lexical Substitutions to Enhance Membership Verification of an LLM's Textual Training Data
Capacity Matters: a Proof-of-Concept for Transformer Memorization on Real-World Data
Diffusion models under low-noise regime
HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial Optimization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.