Causal Parrots: Large Language Models May Talk Causality But Are Not Causal
원문 초록
Some argue scale is all what is needed to achieve AI, covering even causal models. We make it clear that large language models (LLMs) cannot be causal and give reason onto why sometimes we might feel otherwise. To this end, we define and exemplify a new subgroup of Structural Causal Model (SCM) that we call meta SCM which encode causal facts about other SCM within their variables. We conjecture that in the cases where LLM succeed in doing causal inference, underlying was a respective meta SCM that exposed correlations between causal facts in natural language on whose data the LLM was ultimately trained. If our hypothesis holds true, then this would imply that LLMs are like parrots in that they simply recite the causal knowledge embedded in the data. Our empirical analysis provides favoring evidence that current LLMs are even weak `causal parrots.'
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Learning Causally Predictable Outcomes from Psychiatric Longitudinal Data
Towards Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Missing Modalities and Distribution Shifts
From Images to Insights: Explainable Biodiversity Monitoring with Plain Language Habitat Explanations
Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery
Causal Effect Identification in lvLiNGAM from Higher-Order Cumulants
N$^2$: A Unified Python Package and Test Bench for Nearest Neighbor-Based Matrix Completion
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.