Endogenous Macrodynamics in Algorithmic Recourse
원문 초록
Existing work on Counterfactual Explanations (CE) and Algorithmic Recourse (AR) has largely focused on single individuals in a static environment: given some estimated model, the goal is to find valid counterfactuals for an individual instance that fulfill various desiderata. The ability of such counterfactuals to handle dynamics like data and model drift remains a largely unexplored research challenge. There has also been surprisingly little work on the related question of how the actual implementation of recourse by one individual may affect other individuals. Through this work, we aim to close that gap. We first show that many of the existing methodologies can be collectively described by a generalized framework. We then argue that the existing framework does not account for a hidden external cost of recourse, that only reveals itself when studying the endogenous dynamics of recourse at the group level. Through simulation experiments involving various state-of the-art counterfactual generators and several benchmark datasets, we generate large numbers of counterfactuals and study the resulting domain and model shifts. We find that the induced shifts are substantial enough to likely impede the applicability of Algorithmic Recourse in some situations. Fortunately, we find various strategies to mitigate these concerns. Our simulation framework for studying recourse dynamics is fast and opensourced.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Graph Style Transfer for Counterfactual Explainability
Performative Validity of Recourse Explanations
Generalizability vs. Counterfactual Explainability Trade-Off
Real-time Program Evaluation using Anytime-valid Rank Tests
Learning Time Series Counterfactuals via Latent Space Representations
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.