Benchmarking Scalable Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Organ Segmentation
원문 초록
Deep learning based methods for automatic organ segmentation have shown promise in aiding diagnosis and treatment planning. However, quantifying and understanding the uncertainty associated with model predictions is crucial in critical clinical applications. While many techniques have been proposed for epistemic or model-based uncertainty estimation, it is unclear which method is preferred in the medical image analysis setting. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study that evaluates epistemic uncertainty quantification methods in organ segmentation in terms of accuracy, uncertainty calibration, and scalability. We provide a comprehensive discussion of the strengths, weaknesses, and out-of-distribution detection capabilities of each method as well as recommendations for future improvements. These findings contribute to the development of reliable and robust models that yield accurate segmentations while effectively quantifying epistemic uncertainty.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI
GroundingDINO-US-SAM: Text-Prompted Multi-Organ Segmentation in Ultrasound with LoRA-Tuned Vision-Language Models
AI-Driven MRI-based Brain Tumour Segmentation Benchmarking
BRISC: Annotated Dataset for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification with Swin-HAFNet
A Comprehensive Survey on Video Scene Parsing:Advances, Challenges, and Prospects
Crosslink-Net: Double-Branch Encoder Network via Fusing Vertical and Horizontal Convolutions for Medical Image Segmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.