Updating Clinical Risk Stratification Models Using Rank-Based Compatibility: Approaches for Evaluating and Optimizing Clinician-Model Team Performance
원문 초록
As data shift or new data become available, updating clinical machine learning models may be necessary to maintain or improve performance over time. However, updating a model can introduce compatibility issues when the behavior of the updated model does not align with user expectations, resulting in poor user-model team performance. Existing compatibility measures depend on model decision thresholds, limiting their applicability in settings where models are used to generate rankings based on estimated risk. To address this limitation, we propose a novel rank-based compatibility measure, $C^R$, and a new loss function that aims to optimize discriminative performance while encouraging good compatibility. Applied to a case study in mortality risk stratification leveraging data from MIMIC, our approach yields more compatible models while maintaining discriminative performance compared to existing model selection techniques, with an increase in $C^R$ of $0.019$ ($95\%$ confidence interval: $0.005$, $0.035$). This work provides new tools to analyze and update risk stratification models used in clinical care.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
The use of cross validation in the analysis of designed experiments
Router-R1: Teaching LLMs Multi-Round Routing and Aggregation via Reinforcement Learning
Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learning
Behavioral Augmentation of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Method Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.