Fact-Checking Generative AI: Ontology-Driven Biological Graphs for Disease-Gene Link Verification
원문 초록
Since the launch of various generative AI tools, scientists have been striving to evaluate their capabilities and contents, in the hope of establishing trust in their generative abilities. Regulations and guidelines are emerging to verify generated contents and identify novel uses. we aspire to demonstrate how ChatGPT claims are checked computationally using the rigor of network models. We aim to achieve fact-checking of the knowledge embedded in biological graphs that were contrived from ChatGPT contents at the aggregate level. We adopted a biological networks approach that enables the systematic interrogation of ChatGPT's linked entities. We designed an ontology-driven fact-checking algorithm that compares biological graphs constructed from approximately 200,000 PubMed abstracts with counterparts constructed from a dataset generated using the ChatGPT-3.5 Turbo model. In 10-samples of 250 randomly selected records a ChatGPT dataset of 1000 "simulated" articles , the fact-checking link accuracy ranged from 70% to 86%. This study demonstrated high accuracy of aggregate disease-gene links relationships found in ChatGPT-generated texts.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MultiHal: Multilingual Dataset for Knowledge-Graph Grounded Evaluation of LLM Hallucinations
A Temporal FRBR/FRBRoo-Based Model for Component-Level Versioning of Legal Norms
From Generation to Detection: A Multimodal Multi-Task Dataset for Benchmarking Health Misinformation
Chatting with Papers: A Hybrid Approach Using LLMs and Knowledge Graphs
Communication Styles and Reader Preferences of LLM and Human Experts in Explaining Health Information
Computational Fact-Checking of Online Discourse: Scoring scientific accuracy in climate change related news articles
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.