Distractor generation for multiple-choice questions with predictive prompting and large language models
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks and have garnered significant attention from both researchers and practitioners. However, in an educational context, we still observe a performance gap in generating distractors -- i.e., plausible yet incorrect answers -- with LLMs for multiple-choice questions (MCQs). In this study, we propose a strategy for guiding LLMs such as ChatGPT, in generating relevant distractors by prompting them with question items automatically retrieved from a question bank as well-chosen in-context examples. We evaluate our LLM-based solutions using a quantitative assessment on an existing test set, as well as through quality annotations by human experts, i.e., teachers. We found that on average 53% of the generated distractors presented to the teachers were rated as high-quality, i.e., suitable for immediate use as is, outperforming the state-of-the-art model. We also show the gains of our approach 1 in generating high-quality distractors by comparing it with a zero-shot ChatGPT and a few-shot ChatGPT prompted with static examples.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Wrong Answers Can Also Be Useful: PlausibleQA -- A Large-Scale QA Dataset with Answer Plausibility Scores
LookAlike: Consistent Distractor Generation in Math MCQs
D-GEN: Automatic Distractor Generation and Evaluation for Reliable Assessment of Generative Model
Do LLMs Make Mistakes Like Students? Exploring Natural Alignment between Language Models and Human Error Patterns
Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction
Training-free LLM Merging for Multi-task Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.