Evaluating Generative Models for Graph-to-Text Generation
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely employed for graph-to-text generation tasks. However, the process of finetuning LLMs requires significant training resources and annotation work. In this paper, we explore the capability of generative models to generate descriptive text from graph data in a zero-shot setting. Specifically, we evaluate GPT-3 and ChatGPT on two graph-to-text datasets and compare their performance with that of finetuned LLM models such as T5 and BART. Our results demonstrate that generative models are capable of generating fluent and coherent text, achieving BLEU scores of 10.57 and 11.08 for the AGENDA and WebNLG datasets, respectively. However, our error analysis reveals that generative models still struggle with understanding the semantic relations between entities, and they also tend to generate text with hallucinations or irrelevant information. As a part of error analysis, we utilize BERT to detect machine-generated text and achieve high macro-F1 scores. We have made the text generated by generative models publicly available.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FIFA: Unified Faithfulness Evaluation Framework for Text-to-Video and Video-to-Text Generation
ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMs
FarsEval-PKBETS: A new diverse benchmark for evaluating Persian large language models
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.