Synthetic Dataset for Evaluating Complex Compositional Knowledge for Natural Language Inference
원문 초록
We introduce a synthetic dataset called Sentences Involving Complex Compositional Knowledge (SICCK) and a novel analysis that investigates the performance of Natural Language Inference (NLI) models to understand compositionality in logic. We produce 1,304 sentence pairs by modifying 15 examples from the SICK dataset (Marelli et al., 2014). To this end, we modify the original texts using a set of phrases - modifiers that correspond to universal quantifiers, existential quantifiers, negation, and other concept modifiers in Natural Logic (NL) (MacCartney, 2009). We use these phrases to modify the subject, verb, and object parts of the premise and hypothesis. Lastly, we annotate these modified texts with the corresponding entailment labels following NL rules. We conduct a preliminary verification of how well the change in the structural and semantic composition is captured by neural NLI models, in both zero-shot and fine-tuned scenarios. We found that the performance of NLI models under the zero-shot setting is poor, especially for modified sentences with negation and existential quantifiers. After fine-tuning this dataset, we observe that models continue to perform poorly over negation, existential and universal modifiers.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding
Negation: A Pink Elephant in the Large Language Models' Room?
A MISMATCHED Benchmark for Scientific Natural Language Inference
Parameter-Efficient Transformer Embeddings
NegVQA: Can Vision Language Models Understand Negation?
Disentangling Linguistic Features with Dimension-Wise Analysis of Vector Embeddings
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.