On Regularization and Inference with Label Constraints
원문 초록
Prior knowledge and symbolic rules in machine learning are often expressed in the form of label constraints, especially in structured prediction problems. In this work, we compare two common strategies for encoding label constraints in a machine learning pipeline, regularization with constraints and constrained inference, by quantifying their impact on model performance. For regularization, we show that it narrows the generalization gap by precluding models that are inconsistent with the constraints. However, its preference for small violations introduces a bias toward a suboptimal model. For constrained inference, we show that it reduces the population risk by correcting a model's violation, and hence turns the violation into an advantage. Given these differences, we further explore the use of two approaches together and propose conditions for constrained inference to compensate for the bias introduced by regularization, aiming to improve both the model complexity and optimal risk.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Learning Identifiable Structures Helps Avoid Bias in DNN-based Supervised Causal Learning
Meaning Typed Prompting: A Technique for Efficient, Reliable Structured Output Generation
Conformal Structured Prediction
Deep Sketched Output Kernel Regression for Structured Prediction
To be Continuous, or to be Discrete, Those are Bits of Questions
CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.